Vadim Peretokin <email address hidden> writes:
> Oh. Well, I thought it was open-source since there's no visible license, > hence, it's in the public domain - and that means freely > distributable.
This assumption does not hold. We require explicit copyright notices for every code, and cannot assume "public domain" if none is given.
-- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
Vadim Peretokin <email address hidden> writes:
> Oh. Well, I thought it was open-source since there's no visible license,
> hence, it's in the public domain - and that means freely
> distributable.
This assumption does not hold. We require explicit copyright notices for
every code, and cannot assume "public domain" if none is given.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4