Log in / Register
Ubuntu
gnome-python-extras package
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #375355
Comment #2
Comment 2 for bug 375355
Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128)
wrote
on 2009-05-12
:
#2
the update looks mostly ok, but is there any reason to keep the gtkhtml dbg in their own binary?
the update looks mostly ok, but is there any reason to keep the gtkhtml dbg in their own binary?
the update looks mostly ok, but is there any reason to keep the gtkhtml dbg in their own binary?