Comment 18 for bug 72468

Left a widely known buggy application that does not accomplish what it
was supposed to do won't help either... It is not a main application.
We all could live without it. Just create a Trash icon on the desktop
and forget about this buggy applet until it get fixed.

I think I did not made my point clear. I believe giving Ubuntu users a
buggy day by day experience will not make them happy. I am trying to
say that if a software is not mature to get into an Ubuntu release,
then it should wait until the next one. Letting thousands of people
loose time with a buggy application on a release is not a good thing
to let happen.

The point I am trying to target here is Ubuntu quality software. One
example is my Firefox that I've just updated and got all broken (I
made a bug report and a couple of other users had the same issue). One
day Ubuntu works, the other it is broken (FF is THE main application I
use with Ubuntu). I am using a clean release distribution, there
should not have broken applications with it. Should it?

I am not in control of Ubuntu, I am just making a suggestion here that
I believe all community would be happy with. I may be wrong. Please do
not pick me wrong.

On 7/23/07, Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden> wrote:
> removing applications because they have bugs is not a constructive way
> to do things and you would not many software left to install if any
>
> --
> Trash looks empty, isn't
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/72468
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

--
Fabio Pugliese Ornellas
E-Mail: <email address hidden>
gTalk: <email address hidden>
ICQ: 6516089
MSN: <email address hidden>
WWW: http://ornellas.apanela.com/