Comment 6 for bug 420609

To tell the truth I've not tested the patch, so I don't know if it will result in a correct thing. And the patch is not complete.

1) on the eglibc mailing list they say that they just copied the tree. In fact they don't want a fix in eglibc, but directly in glibc.
2) I'm not sure that the historical separator is "." do you have a reference? In the IBM reference they say it's ":" We need to find something official. Is there an organization which have this information?

the final patch should generate a format like this (either with . or :)
ven 9 ott 2009, 11:52:15, CEST 2009

Now it is
ven ott 9 11:52:15 CEST 2009