Comment 8 for bug 192134

I'm not the only one with such problems:
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5997
I assume that for the 64-bit distribution (x86_64), it should use sin and sinf
from i386 arch (sysdeps\i386\fpu\s_sin.S and sysdeps\i386\fpu\s_sinf.S) and only
sinl implementation is explicit x86_64. But the sin and sinf are now used as
software versions (IBM library). And it's usually bit slower, sometimes MUCH
MORE slower (1000x).
IBM library is perhaps only emergency implementation (if there is no hw support)
and it's not used for "better" (<= 0.5ULP) precision.
"The First Step is to Admit You Have a Problem!"