Comment 42 for bug 1757517

(In reply to comment #36)
> Carlos, any update on this?
>
> We've just run into this problem again: java loading JNI code instrumented for
> profiling created thread stack blocks that were too small.
>
> It would be *really* nice for glibc to just do the right thing and account for
> __static_tls without users having to explicitly work around it (by adding
> __static_tls to their requested stack size).

I agree. No update on this yet. I'll see what I can do in the next week or so.