Ubuntu
glibc package

  1. Bug #1663280
  2. Comment #18

Comment 18 for bug 1663280

Revision history for this message
Florian Weimer (fw) wrote :

Daniel, are the patches in comment 17 compatible with the (non-standard) Intel __regcall calling convention>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21265