Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> why did you open the other bug on firefox if you think that's not a
> firefox issue?
>
>
It can't be opened as a Nautilus problem. All your previous arguments
were that it must be something other than Nautilus. I'm unfamiliar with
the process of opening a new bug so if it became a Firefox problem that
might be because I put Firefox in the name.
At this point I'll just say that it's all a wash and cancel the bug
report and stick to using wget. It's a dang nuisance compared to what
was available before but less of a problem than trying to satisfy the
bug reporting process.
I had written a longer note about this but, really, there's no point.
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> why did you open the other bug on firefox if you think that's not a
> firefox issue?
>
>
It can't be opened as a Nautilus problem. All your previous arguments
were that it must be something other than Nautilus. I'm unfamiliar with
the process of opening a new bug so if it became a Firefox problem that
might be because I put Firefox in the name.
At this point I'll just say that it's all a wash and cancel the bug
report and stick to using wget. It's a dang nuisance compared to what
was available before but less of a problem than trying to satisfy the
bug reporting process.
I had written a longer note about this but, really, there's no point.