On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 13:23, Salvatore Bonaccorso
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Hi Shirish
Hi Salvatore Bonaccorso,
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 03:35:37AM -0000, Shirish Agarwal wrote:
>> Giplet update-interval is set below 10 minutes.
Sorry that should have been set at 10 minutes, not below, sorry for
the confusion.
> Ok, could you please set it to at least 10 minutes (at least now for
> testing, to not refresh to fast, and then blocking, example,
> whatismyip.org will block requests, if they are to frequent in 60s
> interval)? Also after installing new version of giplet, please try to do:
> - Remove ~/.giplet if it still around (not needed but clean up)
> - Remove the applet from panel
> - Re-add it to panel
Aha, ~/.giplet was still lying around.
<snip>
> Sorry, that was clearly my fault! Should be there now.
>
> If we are not successfull, with that version I will forward this issue
> today or tomorrow directly to upstream author.
Thank you, updating the index as we speak.
It seems to have not been published so far :(
> Kind regards
> Salvatore
>
> p.s.: sorry for the name confusion.
Reply in-line :-
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 13:23, Salvatore Bonaccorso
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Hi Shirish
Hi Salvatore Bonaccorso,
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 03:35:37AM -0000, Shirish Agarwal wrote:
>> Giplet update-interval is set below 10 minutes.
Sorry that should have been set at 10 minutes, not below, sorry for
the confusion.
> Ok, could you please set it to at least 10 minutes (at least now for
> testing, to not refresh to fast, and then blocking, example,
> whatismyip.org will block requests, if they are to frequent in 60s
> interval)? Also after installing new version of giplet, please try to do:
> - Remove ~/.giplet if it still around (not needed but clean up)
> - Remove the applet from panel
> - Re-add it to panel
Aha, ~/.giplet was still lying around.
<snip>
> Sorry, that was clearly my fault! Should be there now.
>
> If we are not successfull, with that version I will forward this issue
> today or tomorrow directly to upstream author.
Thank you, updating the index as we speak.
It seems to have not been published so far :(
> Kind regards
> Salvatore
>
> p.s.: sorry for the name confusion.
-- creativecommons .org/licenses/ by-nc/3. 0/ flossexperience s.wordpress. com
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://
http://
065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17