Well it should be libgio-2.0/libgio2.0-dev (if it's not already); it follows the naming pattern of the rest of GLib in this sense. But yes, gio-standalone should probably die, and any applications that currently depend on it should move to glib-gio very soon (very few exist as far as I know).
Well it should be libgio- 2.0/libgio2. 0-dev (if it's not already); it follows the naming pattern of the rest of GLib in this sense. But yes, gio-standalone should probably die, and any applications that currently depend on it should move to glib-gio very soon (very few exist as far as I know).