Comment 1 for bug 182945

Revision history for this message
A. Walton (awalton) wrote : Re: [hardy] libgio-dev uninstallable

Well it should be libgio-2.0/libgio2.0-dev (if it's not already); it follows the naming pattern of the rest of GLib in this sense. But yes, gio-standalone should probably die, and any applications that currently depend on it should move to glib-gio very soon (very few exist as far as I know).