odd, i'm getting the same results in cinepaint. I just did this on a blown-up,
gauss-blurred copy and got better results but about 10 times more memory usage;
but I don't want to attach 400k png images.
Well, the cine paint one certainly looks more continuous at least; but I was
shooting for looking like the original image. I'm not a graphics professional
though so *shrug* I can still justify stuff mathematically.
Created an attachment (id=2145)
cinepaint shot.
odd, i'm getting the same results in cinepaint. I just did this on a blown-up,
gauss-blurred copy and got better results but about 10 times more memory usage;
but I don't want to attach 400k png images.
Well, the cine paint one certainly looks more continuous at least; but I was
shooting for looking like the original image. I'm not a graphics professional
though so *shrug* I can still justify stuff mathematically.