Comment 12 for bug 1337898
Revision history for this message
| Sebastian Marsching (sebastian-marsching) wrote | #12 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
I tested the package from trusty-proposed, but I am not sure whether the issue can be considered fixed.
In fact, the dangling symlinks have been removed, but they have not been added in the right place. This means that software depending on libungif will still not compile.
The question is, whether this is by intention: Should libgif provide an alias for libungif (because it effectively provides the functionality of libungif) or is it an intentional choice not to provide libungif and should all software depending on it be changed to depend on libgif instead?