Comment 2 for bug 897309

Revision history for this message
Pavlo Verba (pavlo.s.verba) wrote : Re: [Bug 897309] Re: Package «gs-esp» is still needed in Oneric and higher

Hmm. I am not quite sure you understood my point, let me explain.

These packages are present, indeed and they provide the same functionality,
but I think we still need «gm-esp», or at least a metapackage named exactly
that, so the pre-compiled binaries containing proprietary drivers from
Canon would still install.

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:36 PM, dino99 <email address hidden> wrote:

> you have gsfonts in the repositories, which is a free equivalent to:
> (« gs- gpl », « gs-aflp » et « gs-esp »)
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/897309
>
> Title:
> Package «gs-esp» is still needed in Oneric and higher
>
> Status in “ghostscript” package in Ubuntu:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> Some prineter drivers, namely those for Canon MFs still list it as
> dependency, and I am quite doubtful that we can get Canon to update
> the dependencies of packages.
>
> Right now, users have to find it and manually download it, which is
> not nice.
>
> Please, return it to the repositories.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/897309/+subscriptions
>