Comment 10 for bug 59891

1. Isn't the "better" look of the pnm output only better because it was rendered at very high resolution, and so it is using the pnm viewer's antialiasing, rather than ghostscripts?
2. Does that look appreciably better than using manu's suggested -dAlignToPixels (which does indeed appear to give much better results)?

Generating a .pnm intermediary, instead of rendering properly when rendering directly, seems the wrong solution, to me.