Comment 40 for bug 263773

Revision history for this message
StefanPotyra (sistpoty) wrote : Re: [Bug 263773] Re: ghc 6.8.2 has important performance bug, should be updated to 6.8.3

Hi,

On Tuesday 07 October 2008 14:27:40 Iain Lane wrote:
> It depends how conservative we want to be I guess. All of the fixes
> between Hardy and Intrepid are bug/buildfixes so there should be no new
> regressions introduced, but this is the only fix we really want.
> Subscribing motu-sru for an opinion.

well, I guess the fix for Debian #491909 would also be good to have.
I guess it makes sense to also have the watcher script that prints stuff
during build, as I don't want to pester our buildd admins again if the build
times out on sparc.

Oh, can you eventually open a separate bug for the SRU, so that it's not so
clattered with a lengthy history of comments? (and wrong assumptions from
myself *cough* ;))

>
> As for darcs, a simple grepping of the source shows that the version in
> Hardy calls getSymbolicLinkStatus so I guess it's still affected, if not
> as severely as 2.x. It's worth a rebuild in -updates IMHO.

Ok, thanks!

Cheers,
    Stefan.