On Monday 08 September 2008 13:32:36 Mark Stosberg wrote:
[..]
>
> have this bug without changing the ABI?
>
> Stefan said "the fix would change the ghc6 abi". That could be clarified
> was to whether *any* fix would do that, or fixing it via upgrading 6.8.3
> would do that.
Any fix applied to ghc would do that... :/
>
> Let me restate Zooko's concern more plainly from a users perspective: Is
> there a way to ship a fixed darcs binary, regardless of what happens
> with GHC and the Haskell package chain?
Hi,
On Monday 08 September 2008 13:32:36 Mark Stosberg wrote:
[..]
>
> have this bug without changing the ABI?
>
> Stefan said "the fix would change the ghc6 abi". That could be clarified
> was to whether *any* fix would do that, or fixing it via upgrading 6.8.3
> would do that.
Any fix applied to ghc would do that... :/
>
> Let me restate Zooko's concern more plainly from a users perspective: Is
> there a way to ship a fixed darcs binary, regardless of what happens
> with GHC and the Haskell package chain?
that's a good question, and I only know about it what's presented at bugs.darcs. net/issue973.
http://
Any help in this regard would be highly appreciated!
Cheers,
Stefan.