Comment 13 for bug 125887

Revision history for this message
André Pirard (a.pirard) wrote : Re: [Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected "file modified by another process" warning

On 11/08/2008 11:52, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Nobody sent the request upstream, closing the bug for now, feel free to
> reopen if you still have some interest in the change and wants to open
> the bug on bugzilla.gnome.org too
>
> ** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu)
> Status: Incomplete => Invalid
>
Does that mean that one full year after reporting the problem using the
procedure Ubuntu asks us to use, the answer is "we just don't care?".
Does Ubuntu *really* want users to cooperate?
We're waiting in hope to help Ubuntu and ...
One full year after, the bug is still there and it's something serious
because it accustoms users to give bogus answers to bogus messages at
the risk of giving bogus answers to correct messages.