Ok Martin, no problem. You weren't very keen on the SRU idea in December either, but you mentioned backports as a possibly passable option. To me, the branches that this bug report resulted in are principally fixes of annoying, buggy behavior. However, I'm sure there are good reasons for the restrictive SRU criteria.
I take it that I now can consider the SRU nomination in the making 'officially' rejected, and start checking out the backport process more closely. :-)
Ok Martin, no problem. You weren't very keen on the SRU idea in December either, but you mentioned backports as a possibly passable option. To me, the branches that this bug report resulted in are principally fixes of annoying, buggy behavior. However, I'm sure there are good reasons for the restrictive SRU criteria.
At https:/ /help.ubuntu. com/community/ UbuntuBackports I read: /wiki.ubuntu. com/StableRelea seUpdates first. We will reject any Backports requests for bugfixes if SRU has not been attempted."
"Please, for bugfixes, try https:/
I take it that I now can consider the SRU nomination in the making 'officially' rejected, and start checking out the backport process more closely. :-)