Comment 72 for bug 437429

On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 15:26 +0000, Philipp Morger wrote:
> I consider this very grave and sad - it's major regression from gdm1, as
> this one was fully configurable and gdm2 is a mere shadow of it.
> Furthermore I'm running now Lucid, which is an LTS, so LTS users have to
> bear it for the next 3 years. It clearly shows for me, that this project
> is seriously missing some business attitude in regard to usability. This
> thing here is not a paper-cut, it's a darn samurai-sword-cut!
>
Comments like that aren't helpful in the slightest. What the project is
missing is some man-power to implement the changes needed. We know that
the feature is missing, we want to be able to implement it and we know
that users want the feature too - we don't need people like you writing
unhelpful comments like this.