> Hi, is anyone working on this? It's really annoying 8-).
So far, Ubuntu ranks _last_ of all bug-tracking systems that I deal with,
for getting things done. Perhaps the package maintainers tend to assume
that all of the work is done in Debian.
> I ran uxterm under strace and it appears to only look for UXTerm and
> _NOT_ UXTerm-color resources. Since x11-common is responsible for
> making it use -color, I looked for uxterm opening that file in the
> strace, but it appears to ignore that file. If I manually xrdb
> -override that file, it works as expected.
>
> In conclusion, the root bug seems to be that uxterm does not (or no
> longer) consults /etc/X11/Xresources/x11-common Could this be a
> regression in Xt? Can this be fixed, maybe? Or is this an unintended
> side-effect of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570447 ?
It could be similar, but this report is older than #570447
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Martin Stolle wrote:
> Hi, is anyone working on this? It's really annoying 8-).
So far, Ubuntu ranks _last_ of all bug-tracking systems that I deal with,
for getting things done. Perhaps the package maintainers tend to assume
that all of the work is done in Debian.
> I ran uxterm under strace and it appears to only look for UXTerm and Xresources/ x11-common Could this be a bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 570447 ?
> _NOT_ UXTerm-color resources. Since x11-common is responsible for
> making it use -color, I looked for uxterm opening that file in the
> strace, but it appears to ignore that file. If I manually xrdb
> -override that file, it works as expected.
>
> In conclusion, the root bug seems to be that uxterm does not (or no
> longer) consults /etc/X11/
> regression in Xt? Can this be fixed, maybe? Or is this an unintended
> side-effect of http://
It could be similar, but this report is older than #570447
-- invisible- island. net -island. net
Thomas E. Dickey
http://
ftp://invisible