For Natty, if the dependency stack isn't too deep, we should remove the .la files from packages depending on libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev for preference. See:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-libraries
(Of course, that's not to say that the .la can't be reintroduced to libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev as a stopgap measure.)
For Natty, if the dependency stack isn't too deep, we should remove the .la files from packages depending on libgdk- pixbuf2. 0-dev for preference. See:
http:// www.debian. org/doc/ debian- policy/ ch-files. html#s- libraries
(Of course, that's not to say that the .la can't be reintroduced to libgdk- pixbuf2. 0-dev as a stopgap measure.)