Comment 8 for bug 2015496

Revision history for this message
Utkarsh Gupta (utkarsh) wrote (last edit ):

Hi Timo,

Actually, we received back-to-back requests and by the time this update was accepted into -proposed, the customer bumped the initial request and therefore LP: #2020770 was spun which superseded this one. So with having done the verification of the latter, this one will become moot.

How should we appropriately mark this bug as to reflect the same? Invalid? Or?