Ubuntu
gcc-defaults package

  1. Bug #305460
  2. Comment #23

Comment 23 for bug 305460

Revision history for this message
In , Eyalroz1 (eyalroz1) wrote :

(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #20)
> No, but "the first non-pure, non-inline virtual function in the class" is
> easy for the user to find.

Well, yes, granted, that would be a huge improvement. But then, is binutils allowed to make that assumption about the ABI? ... actually, never mind. Even if it isn't, they could still write something like "The probable cause is a lack of definition of the first virtual method in the class which isn't inline nor pure-virtual".