Comment 9 for bug 984577

Sorry, I think your message is not easily understandable. I think you are trying to say that "the right hand side must be a pointer-to-member", but this is not actually what your proposed message says.

I like more clang's message:

/tmp/webcompile/_28618_0.cc:4:11: error: right hand operand to ->* has non pointer-to-member type 'void ()'
int i = p ->* f ;
          ^ ~

I am not saying that you need to print the type or fix the location (it would be nice but I understand it is quite extra work, and could be done later). But the text could say: "type of right-side operand of %<->*%> is not pointer-to-member", or "right-side operand of %<->*%> has non pointer-to-member type" or "right-side operand of %<->*%> must have pointer-to-member type".