Comment 33 for bug 440172

Revision history for this message
In , Mikpelinux (mikpelinux) wrote :

(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > With binutils from the 2.20 branch, and gcc from the 4.4 branch, including
> > Jakub's patch, and excluding the current workaround from Ramana, I get:
> >
>
> IIUC and to make things explicit, the work-around is needed for any binutils
> prior to the 2.20 branch until the backport is done. If the backport is
> committed we should pull out my work around as well.

The backport has been committed now, so your PR41533 workaround should not be needed any more.