On Saturday 12 September 2009 21:48:47 Matthias Klose wrote:
> See the upstream bug report, this is intended behaviour afaics.
>
>
> ** Bug watch added: GCC Bugzilla #16889
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16889
>
> ** Also affects: gcc via
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16889
> Importance: Unknown
> Status: Unknown
>
> ** Changed in: gcc-4.4 (Ubuntu)
> Status: New => Incomplete
>
However, the problem is not the same as the upstream report.
If we comment out the line b.f(); , the code compiles.
The upstream report is about member selection without the FQN but in my
program, it even generate errors with the FQN.
On Saturday 12 September 2009 21:48:47 Matthias Klose wrote: gcc.gnu. org/bugzilla/ show_bug. cgi?id= 16889 gcc.gnu. org/bugzilla/ show_bug. cgi?id= 16889
> See the upstream bug report, this is intended behaviour afaics.
>
>
> ** Bug watch added: GCC Bugzilla #16889
> http://
>
> ** Also affects: gcc via
> http://
> Importance: Unknown
> Status: Unknown
>
> ** Changed in: gcc-4.4 (Ubuntu)
> Status: New => Incomplete
>
However, the problem is not the same as the upstream report.
If we comment out the line b.f(); , the code compiles.
The upstream report is about member selection without the FQN but in my
program, it even generate errors with the FQN.