--- On Thu, 6/10/10, Matthias Klose <email address hidden> wrote:
> From: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
> Subject: [Bug 313292] Re: gcc 4.2.4 TIMER_ABSOLUTE failure
> To: <email address hidden>
> Received: Thursday, June 10, 2010, 6:35 AM
> marking it as won't fix for gcc-4.2
> (which was removed in lucid).
>
> Gertjan, please could you open a new task for gcc-4.4 in
> this report, if
> it's still reproducible in lucid?
>
>
> ** Changed in: gcc-4.2 (Ubuntu)
> Status: New => Won't
> Fix
>
> --
> gcc 4.2.4 TIMER_ABSOLUTE failure
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313292
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct
> subscriber
> of the bug.
>
Matthias,
A quick test of the code from https:/ /bugzilla. kernel. org/show_ bug.cgi? id=7967
showed everything is fine under Lucid.
Cheers
Gertjan
--- On Thu, 6/10/10, Matthias Klose <email address hidden> wrote:
> From: Matthias Klose <email address hidden> /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 313292
> Subject: [Bug 313292] Re: gcc 4.2.4 TIMER_ABSOLUTE failure
> To: <email address hidden>
> Received: Thursday, June 10, 2010, 6:35 AM
> marking it as won't fix for gcc-4.2
> (which was removed in lucid).
>
> Gertjan, please could you open a new task for gcc-4.4 in
> this report, if
> it's still reproducible in lucid?
>
>
> ** Changed in: gcc-4.2 (Ubuntu)
> Status: New => Won't
> Fix
>
> --
> gcc 4.2.4 TIMER_ABSOLUTE failure
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct
> subscriber
> of the bug.
>