> Occasionally, GCC introduces new warnings. For example, GCC 4 has
> introduced warnings about discrepancies in signedness of integers
> pointed to by otherwise-compatible pointers.
but it is invalid C (standard C that is) so that case should not be mentioned.
Again this is a policy issue rather than really a bug, I am thinking about closing this as invalid as I thought our policy is clear.
This is more of a policy issue rather than a bug.
> Occasionally, GCC introduces new warnings. For example, GCC 4 has compatible pointers.
> introduced warnings about discrepancies in signedness of integers
> pointed to by otherwise-
but it is invalid C (standard C that is) so that case should not be mentioned.
Again this is a policy issue rather than really a bug, I am thinking about closing this as invalid as I thought our policy is clear.