Ubuntu
gcc-4.2 package

  1. Bug #284401
  2. Comment #12

Comment 12 for bug 284401

Revision history for this message
In , Manu-gcc (manu-gcc) wrote :

(In reply to comment #6)
> I think the point Ian was trying to make with (3) was simply that it doesn't
> matter whether you choose to implement the reports of unknown -Wno-* (ie (2))
> using the existing warning mechanism or by just printing to stderr. So it isn't
> a separate thing that needs to be done.
>

OK. I misread it, thanks for the clarification. So, nothing to be done for (3) since there is already a mechanism to report unknown options.