On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:18:50PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Brian M. Carlson writes:
> > The copyright file includes a copy of the GNU Free Documentation
> > License, which has been judged by debian-legal to be non-free. Please
> > remove the non-free material from the package or move the package to
> > non-free.
>
> I do not want to believe that debian-legal judges such nonsense,
> i.e. to distribute a licence file with a non DFSG license. It's
> clearly marked which license terms hold for the libgcc_s.so.1.
I think what he meant was that the documentation licensed under the GFDL
is considered non-free, which is true. This would be a similar bug to #193787
against gcc-3.3 and sarge-ignore like it.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:18:50PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Brian M. Carlson writes:
> > The copyright file includes a copy of the GNU Free Documentation
> > License, which has been judged by debian-legal to be non-free. Please
> > remove the non-free material from the package or move the package to
> > non-free.
>
> I do not want to believe that debian-legal judges such nonsense,
> i.e. to distribute a licence file with a non DFSG license. It's
> clearly marked which license terms hold for the libgcc_s.so.1.
I think what he meant was that the documentation licensed under the GFDL
is considered non-free, which is true. This would be a similar bug to #193787
against gcc-3.3 and sarge-ignore like it.
Gruesse, www.djpig. de/
--
Frank Lichtenheld <email address hidden>
www: http://