Message-ID: <email address hidden> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:53:16 -0700 From: LaMont Jones <email address hidden> To: Andreas Jochens <email address hidden>, <email address hidden> Subject: Re: Bug#282672: modutils: FTBFS with gcc-4.0: invalid lvalue in assignment
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 07:38:53PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote: > -static int errors; > +static int _errors;
Variables beginning with _ are reserved for "the implementation". You're suggesting that I create problems for myself down the road.
Which leads to the question of why gcc-4.0 is polluting the namespace.
lamont
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:53:16 -0700
From: LaMont Jones <email address hidden>
To: Andreas Jochens <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#282672: modutils: FTBFS with gcc-4.0: invalid lvalue in assignment
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 07:38:53PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> -static int errors;
> +static int _errors;
Variables beginning with _ are reserved for "the implementation".
You're suggesting that I create problems for myself down the road.
Which leads to the question of why gcc-4.0 is polluting the namespace.
lamont