Ubuntu
gcc-4.0 package

  1. Bug #10221
  2. Comment #24

Comment 24 for bug 10221

Revision history for this message
In , Matthias Klose (doko-cs) wrote : Re: Bug#280803: Removing GFDL'ed docs from gcc-4.0 packages

Frank =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=BCster?= writes:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> what's up with these bugs (280803 and 321780, 321781, 321782)? Can you
> provide the patches you used to split out the docs from gcc-4.1? I
> think we would need the patches corresponding to these changelog
> entries:
>
> gcc-4.1 (4.1.1ds1-12) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> [Matthias Klose]
> [...]
> * Build without GFDL licensed docs. Closes: #384036.
> - debian/patches/{svn-doc-updates,pr25524-doc,pr26885-doc}.dpatch:
> Split out -doc specific patches.
> - debian/*.texi, debian/porting.html: Add dummy documentation.
> - debian/rules.unpack, debian/rules.patch: Update for non-gfdl build.
> - fastjar.texi: Directly define the gcctabopt and gccoptlist macros.
>
> and
>
> gcc-4.1 (4.1.1-11) unstable; urgency=low
>
> [Matthias Klose]
> [...]
> * Do not build the -doc packages and derived manual pages licensed under
> the GFDL with invariant sections or cover texts.
>
> Can you provide these patches, so that we can start working from them?

all these patches are available in the gcccvs repository at
svn.debian.org. I didn't start working on these.

  Matthias