Ubuntu
gcc-3.3 package

  1. Bug #9465
  2. Comment #27

Comment 27 for bug 9465

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 13:29:49 +0100
From: Andreas Schwab <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#278388: [PR 18189] [3.3 regression] __fixunsdfdi problem on
 m68k

James Troup <email address hidden> writes:

> | $ monica 2.15-2_m68k 2.15-5_m68k=20
> | W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (prot=
ected_undef_def) (non PIC, load offset)
> | W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (prot=
ected_weak) (non PIC, load offset)
> | W: [ld-elfvsb/elfvsb.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): visibility (hidd=
en_weak) (non PIC, load offset)

Please make sure that these aren't in fact spurious failures. Those test=
s
tend to trigger bugs that look like caching problems.

Andreas.

--=20
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, <email address hidden>
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."