It is needed at runtime as well for this library in question.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 19:51, Steve Langasek
<email address hidden>wrote:
> Is there a reason not to fix this using a debian/shlibs.local file?
> It's a kludge, but unless libstdc++5 is needed to be part of main at
> run-time, I think it's better that than promoting (and supporting)
> gcc-3.3.
>
> Also, which package is in restricted, here? I only see packages in
> multiverse; did someone (wrongly) demote fglrx-installer in response to
> the build failure?
>
> --
> Re-promote gcc-3.3 to main
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271794
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
It is needed at runtime as well for this library in question.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 19:51, Steve Langasek
<email address hidden>wrote:
> Is there a reason not to fix this using a debian/shlibs.local file? /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 271794
> It's a kludge, but unless libstdc++5 is needed to be part of main at
> run-time, I think it's better that than promoting (and supporting)
> gcc-3.3.
>
> Also, which package is in restricted, here? I only see packages in
> multiverse; did someone (wrongly) demote fglrx-installer in response to
> the build failure?
>
> --
> Re-promote gcc-3.3 to main
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
--
Mario Limonciello
<email address hidden>