Comment 5 for bug 288446

Revision history for this message
David Kolossa (dickhuuhn-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

This bug is rather severe in my opinion and I can confirm this behavior. In addition, this could be fixed rather easily if one would introduce an extra button/function to take the n-th root of a number and if the argument should be negative it just checks whether the root is odd or not.

That button was missing anyway since it exists on any scientific calculator. For these two reasons I am reopening the bug.