Comment 5 for bug 183840

On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 04:28:08PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 01:29:08PM -0400, William Enck wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:15:24PM +0200, Jan Sechser wrote:
> > > I don't know, but this could satisfy the different licences.
> > > maybe this will require a seperate build environment, though
>
> > > Why the hell nowhere at freeradius.org is this mentioned ?
>
> > It's a hack, but attached is a patch I made. It creates
> > freeradius-eaptls_0.9.3-1_i386.deb
>
> What advantage does this have over building packages from the upstream
> tarball?

Only advantage I see is that it is now managed by dpkg, and if I decide
to remove freeradius, I will also remove these files. This is why I like
the separate openssl-freeradius-module-eap-tls idea. The above was my
solution until a more formal method could be created. I wanted to share
it with others having the same problem. Now I'm leaving the realm of
Debian bug report, and I will stop.

> > I'm sure it breaks license rules, but sometimes people just want to get
> > things working.
>
> I'm not sure why that would belong in a Debian bug report, though.

Nope, doesn't. Sorry about that.

--
William Enck
<email address hidden>