Comment 14 for bug 212588

By accident sitting in front of an Ubuntu 12.10 and tried the default
freemind 0.9.0 package from the repositories.

Looks like my patch is not applied but freemind starts fine.
Maybe /usr/lib/java-wrappers/java-wrappers.sh has been changed in the
meantime or it is due to the fact that this machine here is a very default
installation:
/usr/bin/java -> /etc/alternatives/java
/etc/alternatives/java -> /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-i386/jre/bin/java

while my machine has several java versions installed (as part of my work is
java development) and this is why maybe freemind's way of finding the
correct java installation struggles in the case when multiple java versions
are available on the machine (did not investigate the java-wrappers.sh in
detail).

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Carsten Heidmann <email address hidden>wrote:

> ** Information type changed from Public Security to Public
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212588
>
> Title:
> Does not start
>
> Status in “freemind” package in Ubuntu:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: freemind
>
> Hello! This might be a Java VM generic bug, but I am using another
> Java Application at the same time and it works flawlessly.
>
> dennis@Computer:~$ freemind
> Error occurred during initialization of VM
> java/lang/NoClassDefFoundError: java/lang/Object
>
> dennis@Computer:~$ cat /etc/jvm [...]
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj
> /usr/lib/jvm/ia32-java-1.5.0-sun
> /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun
> /usr
>
> dennis@Computer:~$ sudo update-alternatives --config java [...]
> 1 /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-icedtea/jre/bin/java
> 2 /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/bin/java
> *+ 3 /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/bin/java
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freemind/+bug/212588/+subscriptions
>

--
Martin Wildam

http://martin.wildam.org/