On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 15:46 +0000, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Last time I looked (several weeks ago) the only package I could find
> that depends on fpc is lazarus. The next (hopefully) package that
> depends on fpc will be winff. So unfortunately, I can not do much
> testing there.
No, that's a good thing if you are correct, as you have tested the
only thing that depends on it and it works with winff, so it's a
positive test of the new version.
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 15:46 +0000, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Last time I looked (several weeks ago) the only package I could find
> that depends on fpc is lazarus. The next (hopefully) package that
> depends on fpc will be winff. So unfortunately, I can not do much
> testing there.
No, that's a good thing if you are correct, as you have tested the
only thing that depends on it and it works with winff, so it's a
positive test of the new version.
Thanks,
James