I have only found two differences between the ubuntu and the debian version.
Both are in debian/rules.
1. There is this additional line at the bottom of the include list in ubuntu:
include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ant-vars.mk
2. The DEB_JARS variable is different.
The attachment shows the difference between ubuntu and debian.
This debian bug report says that jimi is not required for fop any longer: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=271654
So the /usr/local/jimi-1.0.jar can be dropped.
(Don't know if /usr/local/jai_core.jar and /usr/local/jai_codec.jar also belong to jimi)
So the real difference between debian and ubuntu according DEB_JARS is this:
jars in debian but not in ubuntu:
batik-all batik-libs xml-apis
jars in ubuntu but not in debian:
batik /usr/local/jimi-1.0.jar /usr/local/jai_core.jar /usr/local/jai_codec.jar
I have only found two differences between the ubuntu and the debian version.
Both are in debian/rules.
1. There is this additional line at the bottom of the include list in ubuntu: cdbs/1/ class/ant- vars.mk
include /usr/share/
2. The DEB_JARS variable is different. bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 271654 jimi-1. 0.jar can be dropped. jai_core. jar and /usr/local/ jai_codec. jar also belong to jimi)
The attachment shows the difference between ubuntu and debian.
This debian bug report says that jimi is not required for fop any longer:
http://
So the /usr/local/
(Don't know if /usr/local/
So the real difference between debian and ubuntu according DEB_JARS is this:
jars in debian but not in ubuntu:
batik-all batik-libs xml-apis
jars in ubuntu but not in debian: jimi-1. 0.jar /usr/local/ jai_core. jar /usr/local/ jai_codec. jar
batik /usr/local/
I don't know which of these batik jars are required. packages. ubuntu. com/jaunty/ all/libbatik- java/filelist
http://
Also I cannot find a package containing a jar for xml-apis.