OK, the foolscap packaging error is fixed in the package for foolscap 0.6.1-2. But the Tahoe-LAFS package doesn't require foolscap 0.6.1-2, does it? So a user of Tahoe-LAFS can still hit the error if that package dependency isn't updated, IIUC.
OK, the foolscap packaging error is fixed in the package for foolscap 0.6.1-2. But the Tahoe-LAFS package doesn't require foolscap 0.6.1-2, does it? So a user of Tahoe-LAFS can still hit the error if that package dependency isn't updated, IIUC.