I'd like to point out that malloc() has its MALLOC_CHECK_ environment variable which activates less efficient implementation designed to be tolerant against simple errors.
Memcpy() bugs happen just like malloc() bugs do. So why not a MEMCPY_CHECK_ ?
I'd like to point out that malloc() has its MALLOC_CHECK_ environment variable which activates less efficient implementation designed to be tolerant
against simple errors.
Memcpy() bugs happen just like malloc() bugs do. So why not a MEMCPY_CHECK_ ?