Andre, no one has abandoned anything. The Adobe website was just poorly updated. The 64-bit plugin was updated[1]. I am running on a *64-bit* Flash plugin version 10.3.162.29. The memcpy() issue is not fixed though. The date stamp is on 2010-11-16, which is around the time the issue was reported, but obviously too old.
As far as Fedora is concerned, I believe all of us here are free to make Fedora what we want. I don't know of any particular Fedora policy (please name one if I am wrong) that prevents any one of us from applying a workaround (be it glibc, be it nspluginwrapper, etc) that helps users *use* Fedora. Being petty and small and telling users to "get lost" makes me disgusted to be considered a Fedora contributor.
P.S. There's a bit much political BS in this bug, which is closed. It may be best to hold further comments until the results of tomorrow's FESCO meeting are known.
Andre, no one has abandoned anything. The Adobe website was just poorly updated. The 64-bit plugin was updated[1]. I am running on a *64-bit* Flash plugin version 10.3.162.29. The memcpy() issue is not fixed though. The date stamp is on 2010-11-16, which is around the time the issue was reported, but obviously too old.
As far as Fedora is concerned, I believe all of us here are free to make Fedora what we want. I don't know of any particular Fedora policy (please name one if I am wrong) that prevents any one of us from applying a workaround (be it glibc, be it nspluginwrapper, etc) that helps users *use* Fedora. Being petty and small and telling users to "get lost" makes me disgusted to be considered a Fedora contributor.
P.S. There's a bit much political BS in this bug, which is closed. It may be best to hold further comments until the results of tomorrow's FESCO meeting are known.
[1] http:// labs.adobe. com/downloads/ flashplayer10_ square. html