Ubuntu
flashplugin-nonfree package

  1. Bug #727064
  2. Comment #131

Comment 131 for bug 727064

Revision history for this message
In , bojan (bojan-redhat-bugs-1) wrote :

(In reply to comment #83)

> Yes, for POSIX compliance, it is necessary to assume that the behaviour is
> undefined. I doubt, though, that Adobe is claiming POSIX conformance or
> portability for its code.

Forget POSIX. It's been like this for forever. K&R C book, 2nd edition, page 250.