Comment 3 for bug 598102

it could be, haven't seen it yet, i'll take a look for it then, thanks

On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 3:10 AM, jotape99 <email address hidden> wrote:

> Probably the same as the bug # 598588 (error in the SHA256NUM_TGZ in the
> postinst script of the package).
>
> --
> package flashplugin-installer 10.1.53.64ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to
> install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
> error exit status 2
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598102
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in “flashplugin-nonfree” package in Ubuntu: New
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree
>
> flash plugin package for amd64
>
> ProblemType: Package
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
> Package: flashplugin-installer 10.1.53.64ubuntu0.10.04.1
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
> Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic x86_64
> Architecture: amd64
> Date: Thu Jun 24 09:40:35 2010
> ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error
> exit status 2
> InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100429)
> SourcePackage: flashplugin-nonfree
> Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.1.53.64ubuntu0.10.04.1 failed to
> install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
> error exit status 2
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/598102/+subscribe
>

--
Wassalamu'alaikum Wr. Wb.

Richard B. Bartels