Comment 74 for bug 429841

Il 29/06/2010 19:22, Jean-Baptiste Lallement ha scritto:
> SRU Verification Lucid:
> I have verified that flashplugin-nonfree (10.1.53.64ubuntu0.10.04.3) in -proposed fixes the removal issue.
> Marking as verification done.
>
> Thanks.
>
> ** Description changed:
>
> TEST CASE for 8.04 -> 10.04 SRU:
> 1. use hardy
> 2. install flashplugin-nonfree
> 3. run "update-manager --proposed" to upgrade to lucid
> 4. verify that it fails in flashplugin-nonfree
>
> 5. use fresh hardy ubuntu desktop but enable hardy-proposed this time
> 6. repeat 2,3
> 7. verify that it works now
>
> Its not really needed to reproduce the failure (step 2,3,4) because of the amount of duplicates. I consider
> this verification a success if 5,6,7 works ok.
> +
> + TEST CASE 2: Removal of flashplugin-nonfree
> + $ apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree
> + $ apt-get remove flashplugin-nonfree
> +
> + VERIFICATION DONE:
> + - Package is removed cleanly
>
>
> Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree
>
> Upgrading 9.04 -> latest karmic.
>
> ProblemType: Package
> Architecture: i386
> Date: Tue Sep 15 06:45:05 2009
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
> ErrorMessage:
> ErrorMessage: Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting configuration.
> Package: flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.22.87ubuntu1
> ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.28-11.38-generic
> SourcePackage: flashplugin-nonfree
> Title: package flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.22.87ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
> Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686
>
> ** Tags added: verification-done
> ** Tags removed: verification-needed
>
>
Thanks to all.