Comment 5 for bug 359116

Nope, no irony. Ubuntu rules. You guys too!

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Alexander Sack <email address hidden> wrote:

> > Jesus! You actually respond to the bugs? How efficient!
>
> is that irony? otherwise, happy that it worked for you now. you are
> welcome! ;)
>
> ** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
> Status: Incomplete => Invalid
>
> --
> package flashplugin-installer 10.0.22.87ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
> takes too long
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359116
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in “flashplugin-nonfree” source package in Ubuntu: Invalid
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree
>
> I waited 15 minutes and the install of this package just hanged on about
> 60%.
>
> ProblemType: Package
> Architecture: i386
> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
> ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script killed by signal
> (Interrupt)
> Package: flashplugin-installer 10.0.22.87ubuntu2
> SourcePackage: flashplugin-nonfree
> Title: package flashplugin-installer 10.0.22.87ubuntu2 failed to
> install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script killed by signal
> (Interrupt)
> Uname: Linux 2.6.28-11-generic i686
>