(In reply to comment #120) > Can bug 181177 be duped to this?
that bug (and the presumably bit-rotted attached patch) is only to make alt-<key> shortcuts work. i marked it as a blocker for this bug to keep them linked.
(In reply to comment #120)
> Can bug 181177 be duped to this?
that bug (and the presumably bit-rotted attached patch) is only to make alt-<key> shortcuts work. i marked it as a blocker for this bug to keep them linked.