I can confirm this bug. But youtube.com gives a BLACK box instead of a gray. I am using Jaunty on amd64. Only flash related package in synaptic selected is adobe-flashplugin.
$ sudo update-alternatives --config xulrunner-addons-flashplugin
Es gibt nur 1 Programm, welches xulrunner-addons-flashplugin bereitstellt (/usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so). Nichts zu konfigurieren.
Konqueror 4.2.2 works, firefox 3.0.12 does not.
Installing the binary libflashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz from adobe manually into ~/.mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so like described in https://bugs.launchpad.net/nspluginwrapper/+bug/246450?comments=all did not help.
"about:plugins" in firefox says that "Shockwave Flash 10.0 r22" is loaded.
For the time being, the adobe-flashplugin should check for amd64 and give a warning or reject installation.
I can confirm this bug. But youtube.com gives a BLACK box instead of a gray.
I am using Jaunty on amd64.
Only flash related package in synaptic selected is adobe-flashplugin.
$ sudo update-alternatives --config xulrunner- addons- flashplugin
Es gibt nur 1 Programm, welches xulrunner- addons- flashplugin bereitstellt adobe-flashplug in/libflashplay er.so). Nichts zu konfigurieren.
(/usr/lib/
Konqueror 4.2.2 works, firefox 3.0.12 does not.
Installing the binary libflashplayer- 10.0.22. 87.linux- x86_64. so.tar. gz from adobe manually into ~/.mozilla/ plugins/ libflashplayer. so like described in https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/nspluginwr apper/+ bug/246450? comments= all did not help.
"about:plugins" in firefox says that "Shockwave Flash 10.0 r22" is loaded.
For the time being, the adobe-flashplugin should check for amd64 and give a warning or reject installation.