Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> I think a more important issue (not that flash not being installed is
> unimportant - i can live without it - i am just saying) - is the fact
> that apt reports it as being installed even though the install failed.
As many of the linked bugs note: the package managers (Synaptic, Adept,
etc) report it as installed, probably because of the exit code of apt.
Apt-get on the command line does not.
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> I think a more important issue (not that flash not being installed is
> unimportant - i can live without it - i am just saying) - is the fact
> that apt reports it as being installed even though the install failed.
As many of the linked bugs note: the package managers (Synaptic, Adept,
etc) report it as installed, probably because of the exit code of apt.
Apt-get on the command line does not.