Bourne wrote: > There is also the matter of the below bug which seems to affect the current > version of flash that is installable in the hardy repo > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/180439 > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-nonfree/+bug/182013 > > Wouldn't the above bug then affect those who it is made available to > through gutsy-updates? >
I may be wrong, of course, but don't these bugs only affect Hardy? i.e. if pushed to gutsy-updates there wouldn't be a problem?
Can anyone shed any light on why 9.0.115.0ubuntu0.7.10 was removed from gutsy-proposed? It seemed to only change the MD5s, which is what we need here.
Bourne wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ flashplugin- nonfree/ +bug/180439 /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ flashplugin- nonfree/ +bug/182013
> There is also the matter of the below bug which seems to affect the current
> version of flash that is installable in the hardy repo
> https:/
> https:/
>
> Wouldn't the above bug then affect those who it is made available to
> through gutsy-updates?
>
I may be wrong, of course, but don't these bugs only affect Hardy? i.e.
if pushed to gutsy-updates there wouldn't be a problem?
Can anyone shed any light on why 9.0.115. 0ubuntu0. 7.10 was removed from
gutsy-proposed? It seemed to only change the MD5s, which is what we need
here.